In this case, point A is me being within reach of the Nationals cuts in the 50 fly, 100 fly, and 100 IM. Point B is me getting the Nats cuts in at least the two fly events. Not worried too much about the 100 IM, since I'm going to swim it one way or another. The same could be said for the fly events, but I've got a personal goal of not only getting back into fly shape, but aging up to a faster age group and getting the Nats cuts in the two fly events within six months of me starting to really practice again.
I've been strategizing how I'm going to get the two fly cuts in the next two spring meets, on March 4th and March 17th. A big part of said strategizing has included looking at my performance in the past few meets in those events.
Take my 50 fly performance in the 50 fly in the past three meets: Annapolis on January 21st, Tropical Splash on January 29th, and then Richmond on February 11th. Here is the time progression I had in those meets, and how those swims were:
- Annapolis: 28.16. Just not a very good swim. Bad start, sloppy turn, not very good finish.
- Tropical Splash: 27.88. The swim itself was fantastic, but I dove for the wall on the finish a full stroke too early, so kicked the rest of the way into the wall. Conservatively, I lost at least half a second right there.
- Richmond: 27.29. Iffy start (went too deep) and totally screwed up the turn, but still had a decent time. Probably lost about half a second on the deep start and frigging terrible turn. Half a second would put me right at the Nats cut.
On the other hand, look at my 100 fly. I've only swum it twice as a Masters swimmer, once in short course meters, the other in yards.
I've been doing a lot of fly in practice, as well as doing a few all-fly-with-fins practices here and there, so my shoulder endurance is pretty decent. Still got a good ways to go to hit my old level of fly endurance, but it's pretty darn good right now, all things considered. The first time I swam the 100 fly, at the SCM meet in early December, I didn't have the endurance, and my swim was terrible. Partly due to me not pacing it well, but mostly because I just died. When I swam it in Richmond, I didn't pace it well at all, and had the small issue of dying halfway through the swim--on a positive note, it was full body weakness, not specifically related to me swimming fly, so that at least is a good sign.
At the Richmond meet, I swam the 200 IM the day before I swam the 100 fly. I was in the lane next to a 33 year old guy who absolutely kicked my butt in the IM. I took it out too slow, and then had my elbow blow up. Bad swim all around. Anyways, getting back on point, here's a comparison of my fly in the 200 IM and the 100 fly:
- First 50 of the 200 IM: Took it out in a 28.28. For the IM, that was a pretty darn slow start--should have been well under a 28.
- First 50 of the 100 fly: Took it out in a 29.67. WAY too slow! For one, that's nearly a full second and a half slower than I took out the 200 IM. I realize that I was still tired from the 100 back I'd done shortly beforehand, but still, that's an embarrasing split.
- Second 50 of the 100 fly: Brought it back in a 35.19. Again, embarrasing, although the whole dying thing played a pretty big part in that performance.
- Take it out in a high 27. That should be about a second slower than my 50 fly time, which is an acceptable difference between the 50 and 100.
- Bring it back in a 31 or 32.
- Nail the turns and breathing pattern.
If I do all these things well, come March 4th, I should be well on my way to Point B!